The panel explained that not fulfilling the objective would pose a public health risk since the use of and exposure to tobacco products would not be reduced.[14] Further, it is widely recognized, and undisputed in these proceedings, that the public health consequences of the use of, and exposure to, tobacco, including in Australia, are particularly grave.[15] Therefore, the panel ruled that the public health consequences of not fulfilling the objective were particularly grave
My immediate response was like, What the (beep) was that
They initially wanted to see what happens to outdoor air particles when they come inside
Cannabis is primarily consumed through inhalation (even though the study did not distinguish between methods of consumption)
Moves to ban them in public have been greeted with dismay by supporters
A land-grant institution, the school quickly became a recognized leader in agricultural science and engineering